What strategies could be employed to minimise resistance to change among university staff?
Quote from webmaster on 20 February 2025, 11:44Resistance to change is a common challenge in universities, particularly when implementing new initiatives or technologies. Effective strategies to minimize this resistance are essential
Resistance to change is a common challenge in universities, particularly when implementing new initiatives or technologies. Effective strategies to minimize this resistance are essential
Quote from Guest on 9 March 2025, 11:59Incorporating the processes as a daily routine in a efficient way. These changes must be not incorporated as added work, they must be included as a new way to do the things.
Incorporating the processes as a daily routine in a efficient way. These changes must be not incorporated as added work, they must be included as a new way to do the things.
Quote from Guest on 20 March 2025, 13:50To minimize resistance to institutional change at small and peripheral universities (as most of the ones existing in outermost regions), strategies to be implemented must focus on engagement, communication, and gradual implementation, namely:
- Inclusive Decision-Making – Involve faculty in shaping reforms through advisory committees and pilot programs to foster ownership.
- Transparent Communication – Explain the rationale for change using regular updates and success stories from similar institutions.
- Targeted Professional Development – Offer training and mentorship to help staff adapt while recognizing early adopters.
- Institutional Framing – Align changes with the university’s identity and long-term sustainability to make them feel necessary and natural.
- Phased Implementation – Introduce changes gradually, allowing adaptation and flexibility to address concerns.
To minimize resistance to institutional change at small and peripheral universities (as most of the ones existing in outermost regions), strategies to be implemented must focus on engagement, communication, and gradual implementation, namely:
- Inclusive Decision-Making – Involve faculty in shaping reforms through advisory committees and pilot programs to foster ownership.
- Transparent Communication – Explain the rationale for change using regular updates and success stories from similar institutions.
- Targeted Professional Development – Offer training and mentorship to help staff adapt while recognizing early adopters.
- Institutional Framing – Align changes with the university’s identity and long-term sustainability to make them feel necessary and natural.
- Phased Implementation – Introduce changes gradually, allowing adaptation and flexibility to address concerns.